Since 1980, in my opinion, no essential progress in N-representability condition other than Braams' JCP 2004 T1/T2 paper. Even, Braams's conditions are originally from Erdahl's 1978 paper. Trivial one is Erdahl and Jin's k-th order approximation (Mazziotti calls k-positivity). I'm very sure we all know them. Erdahl implicitly uses it, of course. otherwise how Braams extract from Erdahl's paper? :-)
I's a pity I couldn't find any applicable new N-representability conditions.
2009年6月17日水曜日
登録:
コメントの投稿 (Atom)
フォロワー
ブログ アーカイブ
-
▼
2009
(18)
-
▼
6月
(17)
- Excited state 2-RDM
- Why 1-RDM doesn't matter?
- Quantum Marginals and Density Matrices Workshop in...
- Quantum Marginals and Density Matrices Workshop in...
- Mpack: multiple precision arithmetic version of BL...
- multiple precision arithmetic version of semidefin...
- The Density equation
- Husimi Kodi sensei
- No I don't find a new N-representability condition.
- T1 and T2 condition
- Potential energy surface
- When I realized semidefinite programming is applic...
- everything is NP-hard
- Gamess on FreeBSD 7.2/amd64
- History of early days of reduced density matrix th...
- Back from Canada (with slide in PDF)
- Nakata Maho's reseach blog has been started
-
▼
6月
(17)
自己紹介
- NAKATA, Maho
- * second order reduced density matrices * N-representability * Quantum Computer * multiple precision arithmetic
Nakata Maho is a scientist and interested in reduced density matrix related theories, optimization and multiple precision arithmetics.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿